Targeting the Poor in Mexico: an Evaluation of the Selection of Households for Progresa
نویسندگان
چکیده
This report reevaluates PROGRESA’s targeting methods since the program began adding beneficiary households through a process called “densification.” The authors first evaluate PROGRESA’s accuracy in targeting both at the community and household levels. Second, they evaluate the targeting in terms of its impact on poverty alleviation relative to other feasible methods assuming the same total budget. The first step is accomplished by comparing PROGRESA’s method to an alternative selection method based on household consumption. For the second task, the costs associated with different schemes are compared for their effects on the budget available for poverty alleviation. Schemes considered include uniform transfers that involve no targeting, targeting based on consumption, and targeting at the locality rather than the household. The authors find that PROGRESA’s marginality index performs quite well when contrasted to a consumption-based model of locality selection. The consumption-based model results in a more precise categorization of poverty, which implies that geographic targeting based on the marginality index is more likely to result in leakage rather than undercoverage. The fit between the two methods is particularly tight for the low and very high marginality categories, and is more diffuse in the middle categories. This suggests that the PROGRESA marginality index loses its power of distinction between mediummarginality localities. The analysis also showed that PROGRESA’s targeting appears to accurately identify extremely poor households, but makes more errors identifying moderately poor households. This finding raises serious concerns about PROGRESA’s
منابع مشابه
PROGRESA and Its Impacts on the Welfare
programs aimed at developing the human capital of poor households. Its 1999 budget of about $777 million equaled 0.2 percent of Mexico’s gross domestic product (GDP). By the end of that year, PROGRESA covered approximately 2.6 million families in almost 50,000 localities in more than 2,000 municipalities.These beneficiaries comprised about 40 percent of all rural families, or oneninth of all Me...
متن کاملPROGRESA and its Impacts on the Human Capital and Welfare of Households in Rural Mexico: A Synthesis of the Results of an Evaluation by IFPRI
متن کامل
An Evaluation of the Impact of Progresa on Preschool Child Height
The nutrition of preschool children is of considerable interest not only because of concern over their immediate welfare, but also because their nutrition in this formative stage of life is widely perceived to have substantial persistent impact on their physical and mental development and on their health status as adults. Children’s physical and mental development shapes their later lives by af...
متن کاملRural Poverty Alleviation and Household Consumption Smoothing: Evidence from PROGRESA in Mexico
This study uses three rounds of panel data between October 1998 and November 1999 and covering 506 villages and 24,000 households in rural Mexico, to examine how the replacement of pre-existing subsidy programs by a conditional cash transfer program such as PROGRESA (the Health, Education and Nutrition Program) affects the consumption smoothing of households. The results obtained are consistent...
متن کاملIs Progresa Working? Summary of the Results of an Evaluation by Ifpri
Programa Nacional de Educacion, Salud y Alimentacion (PROGRESA) is one of the major programs of the Mexican government aimed at developing the human capital of poor households. Targeting its benefits directly to the population in extreme poverty in rural areas, it aims to alleviate current poverty through monetary and in-kind benefits, as well as reduce future levels of poverty by encouraging i...
متن کامل